?

Log in

No account? Create an account

September 7th, 2007

Last September I noted that Harper's Magazine ran a piece by Daniel Ellsberg (he of The Pentagon Papers fame) citing Philip Giraldi, a former CIA official writing in The American Conservative in 2005 that:

"..Vice President Cheney's office had directed contingency planning for 'a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons' and that 'several senior Air Force officers' involved in the planning were 'appalled at the implications of what they are doing -- that Iran is being set up for an unprovoked nuclear attack -- but no one is prepared to damage his career by posing any objection."


Ken Silverstein wrote in his blog on Harper's web site, "Speaking From Experience," this past Tuesday (4 September) that an anonymous CIA official who earlier this year pooh-poohed the idea of a U.S.-launched preemptive war against Iran now thinks that it is highly likely.

*Blinks*

I guess we should be grateful that he doesn't think that a first use of nukes by the U.S. is likely; but then again, I can't say that, since the subject wasn't raised.

Why the CIA source thinks a U.S. attack on Iran is likely.Collapse )

Profile

The supreme space lord who will now DEST
uvula_fr_b4
The Feckless Wonder

Latest Month

March 2015
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow